By Evelyn Pyburn

Yellowstone County has a new addition to its judicial system – -a new court that focuses upon arraignments. It is being operated in the county department of Justices of the Peace. Judge Jeanne Walker and Judge David Carter have been presiding over the court for about a month.

Creating an arraignment court is part of improving and making more efficient the process of adjudicating criminals, which is a necessity in making the new short-term detention facility functional, according to Justice of the Peace Carter, who has spent the past year or more leading the process of developing and establishing the court.

The short-term detention facility is a city-county project in the process of being built next to the Yellowstone County Detention Facility, which is expected to be completed late this fall. It is viewed as a solution to the over-crowded jail that serves Yellowstone County. It will enable law enforcement to arrest and hold those perpetrating offenses who, in the past, law enforcement has not been able to arrest because of having no place to hold them

The concept of an arraignment court – this will be the first one in Montana – emerged from Yellowstone County’s  10-person committee that was appointed two years ago to look at the entire justice system and the new jail proposal for the county and City of Billings, to develop a more efficient and economical system. An arraignment court was viewed as essential to the process of making the short -term detention facility function well.

So far arraignment court has gone well, said Carter. They have focused on working out the wrinkles. “There will probably be changes,” said Carter, but so far it’s been pretty smooth. “We are building something,” he said, “Until you start doing it you are not quite sure how it will work.”

Arraignment court will be held at 2:30 pm every day, Monday through Friday.

An arraignment is usually a felony or misdemeanor defendant’s first court appearance after arrest. During the arraignment, a defendant is formally advised of the criminal charges against him, informed of their rights, and asked to enter a plea to the charges, and often a public defender is appointed. The court also looks at the defendant’s history, and decides whether the defendant will be released pending trial, whether they must wear an ankle bracelet and bond is set.

A public defender stands with the defendant during the process to explain and advise about the proceedings.

The judge goes through a process of sorting out the charges against a defendant in accordance with state laws or local ordinances, looking at their criminal record and determining, if there are other outstanding charges, misdemeanors or felons.

Most of the time a defendant has other outstanding charges against them, perhaps in more than one court, explained Judge Carter. During arraignment court the judge gives them a schedule of not only their next court appearance on the current charge, but also other pending court appearances and dates at which they are required to appear.

According to Judge Carter, missing court dates is the most common infraction for which other charges are often made. “It gets to be a revolving door,” he said, underscoring that their goal is “to get the people who don’t need to be in jail out, or to make sure they are in jail for the right period of time – – and to do that correctly — more efficiently and elegantly and timely.” Court hearing dates can be complicated, he said, and overwhelming for people who sometimes have many other unfortunate things happening in their lives.

Currently, the defendants appear in arraignment court via video from the Yellowstone County Detention Facility (YCDF), with the court room located in the County Courthouse. Asked if that will continue to be the model, Judge Carter said it is not considered best practices. Ideally, he believes, arraignment court should be held at the YCDF.

Whether that will be included for the plans of a new addition to the YCDF, he isn’t sure. The county has to authorize that, he said, adding, “There has been discussions, and support expressed. But there is no room currently.”

The process of being prepared for their first court appearance is far more complicated than it might appear. It takes a staff of knowledgeable and trained people to prepare the case – to gather all the documents pertaining to other outstanding charges and their status, and to check on the defendant’s record, family and criminal record. The first half of the day on court days is spent by staff preparing all the necessary information and documentation for the judge. Some are on the job at 6 a.m.

Starting an arraignment court required the hiring of 1.5 FTEs (employees) said Carter, pointing out however that much of the work involved is being absorbed into by the existing Justice Court staff. While $45,000 has been set aside in the budget for the arraignment court, it is just there in case they discover a need for it.

Right now there are five people in Justice Court dedicated to pre- trial services. “It is more expansive than just arraignment court,” explained Judge Carter. “We have other programs for pre- trial services.” Four of the five staff members have been trained for arraignment court, but they also have secondary duties. “It is very hard,” said Judge Carter, “But we are building on that and will evolve.”

In the long term – which essentially means when most of the county’s administration offices move into the county’s new administration building, and the Courthouse has been remodeled as exclusively a court house – Justice Court anticipates requesting another Justice of the Peace. An additional Justice of the Peace would be welcomed, said Judge Carter.

The challenges before Yellowstone County’s judicial system are significant and so will be the challenges to the arraignment court which will not only be serving a justice court with the largest case load in the state, but also a district court with the largest case load in the state, and a city with the largest municipal court case load in the state. They haven’t taken on the arraignments for the city municipal court yet because that court is quite literally in the process of moving to the new city hall.

The arraignment court expects to assume their case load in May.

The state of Montana’s General Fund tax revenues declined in 2024, according to Terry Johnson, former chief revenue forecaster for the state of Montana, now retired.

In Fiscal 2024, total general fund revenue collections were $3.32 billion, with 76.9% collected from income (individual and corporation) taxes. These revenues are used to finance a variety of state services, but most are used for education, human service, and public safety programs, explained Johnson in an article included in the Bureau of Business and Economic Research’s report included as information for their annual Economic Outlook Seminar.

Total General Fund revenue collections decreased by $620.8 million, or 15.7 %, from collections received in fiscal 2023.

This change was unusually large, according to Johnson, due to a decline in property taxes, which were $338.8 million in 2023., “Other Sources” was down $249.9 million, and revenue collected from natural resources (including oil and natural gas tax) declined $31.4 million, for a total decline of $620.1 million or 15.7 percent.

The property tax decline was due to legislative changes adopted by the 68th Legislature that redirected most of these revenues to a non-general fund account for support of public education.

In addition, there is a non-general fund account called the Budget Stabilization Reserve Fund (BSRF), which is used to provide funding for the general fund account if revenue collections fall below expectations. The BSRF is funded from general-fund monies that are above a specified amount at the end of each fiscal year.

The natural resource revenue decline was due to price and production fluctuations for most of the fossil fuel types.

The decline of $10.4 million in individual income tax collections can be explained by the fact that in 2024 there were no more federal payments to Montana citizens and businesses which were enacted by Congress following the impacts of Covid-19.

The economic statistics maintained by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis provide measures of transfer payments to Montanans as well as wage and salary income of employees. According to their data the amount of change increased by $2.9 billion from 2019 to 2020, a 27.4% increase with a further increase of $1.2 billion from 2020 to 2021 for a total increase of $4.1 billion over the two-year period. Once the stimulus payments were eliminated, transfer payments declined by $1.6 billion from 2021 to 2022.

Transfer payments from 2022 to 2023 have now returned to a more normal growth pattern observed prior to 2020.

The pandemic also had an impact on the workforce available for Montana businesses. Throughout Montana there were numerous posted signs indicating businesses were searching for workers.

This workforce demand increased the wage offerings of businesses.

Higher wages increased total state wage and salary incomes. Total wage income increased by $2.6 billion or 10.9% from 2020 to 2021 and $2.5 billion or 9.4% from 2021 to 2022. Wage growth from 2022 to 2023 has moderated and is now closer to historical trends.

Higher wage income increased state individual income tax collections in fiscal 2022 but were diminished by the decline in transfer payments in calendar 2022. Individual income tax collections are expected to return to a more normal growth pattern after 2024 reflecting more normal growth rates for wages and transfer payments as well as taxpayer behavior payment patterns returning to historical trends.

In the coming days, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) will promulgate a new policy requiring SBA loan applications to include a citizenship verification provision to ensure only legal, eligible applicants can access SBA programs, announced U.S. Small Business Administration Administrator Kelly Loeffler.

 Lenders will be required to confirm that applicant businesses are not owned in whole or in part by an illegal alien, consistent with President Trump’s executive order ending the taxpayer subsidization of open borders.

Additionally, the SBA will relocate six of its regional offices currently in municipalities that do not comply with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Over the coming months, the Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Denver, New York City, and Seattle regional offices will be moved to less costly, more accessible locations that better serve the small business community and comply with federal immigration law.

“Over the last four years, the record invasion of illegal aliens has jeopardized both the lives of American citizens and the livelihoods of American small business owners, who have each become victims of Joe Biden’s migrant crime spree. Under President Trump, the SBA is committed to putting American citizens first again – starting by ensuring that zero taxpayer dollars go to fund illegal aliens,” Administrator Loeffler said.

“Today, I am pleased to announce that this agency will cut off access to loans for illegal aliens and relocate our regional offices out of sanctuary cities that reward criminal behavior. We will return our focus to empowering legal, eligible business owners across the United States – in partnership with the municipalities who share this Administration’s commitment to secure borders and safe communities.”

Under the last Administration, lax guardrails allowed illegal aliens to both apply for and get approved for SBA assistance. In June 2024, the agency approved a $783,000 loan application for a small business that was 49% owned by an illegal alien. Last month, under the leadership of this Administration, an internal SBA audit identified the illegal status of the individual and halted the loan from being disbursed – ensuring that $0 was distributed to the business.

Big Sky Economic Development (BSED) announced that Paul Green has been selected as the organization’s next Executive Director. Green has resigned his position as Director of the Montana Department of Commerce in order to accept the position. Green was appointed as Commerce director in January 2024.

BSED conducted a national search to replace retiring BSED Executive Director, Steve Arveschoug. Arveschoug will continue leading the organization through mid-April, to ensure a smooth transition. A start date for Green has not been determined; additional details will be announced as they become available.

The search for Arveschoug’s replacement was conducted by Jorgenson Pace, a search committee led by BSED Board Members and Montana State University Billings Chancellor Stefani Hicswa, along with other BSED board members and stakeholders.

Green brings extensive experience in economic and community development, project management, and public-private partnerships. As Director of the Montana Department of Commerce Green oversaw multiple divisions focused on business attraction, infrastructure development, tourism, housing, and economic growth. Throughout his career, he has led initiatives that drive job creation, streamline regulations, and enhance stakeholder engagement. His leadership spans roles in both public and private sectors, including serving as Executive Director of the Montana Business Incubator and Two Rivers Economic Development Authority, where he successfully implemented strategic growth initiatives, secured major infrastructure investments, and worked with business and government leaders to foster economic resilience.

“Our selection committee worked hard to find an Executive Director who can lead our organization into the future,” said Nick Pancheau, EDC Board Chair, “As one of the leading Economic Development Organizations in the state with a talented team, it was important to select a candidate that both understands our local economy, and one who is ready to roll up their sleeves and get to work on day one. We believe we have found those attributes in Paul Green and we look forward to his leadership.”

“I am very pleased that the results of our national search resulted in an outstanding pool of highly qualified applicants,” said Chancellor Stefani Hicswa, “Paul will serve us well as our new Executive Director. I appreciate the hard work of the search committee and the excellent feedback from staff and stakeholders.”

Debbie Desjarlais, BSED EDA Board Chair, commented, “I’m pleased with the outcome of the search. The search committee, along with Jorgenson Pace, has worked long and hard on this search. I believe Paul Green is the right person at this time for BSED. Congratulations, Paul. We have the greatest confidence in the world of future success. Not just for the organization, but for the city of Billings.”

Governor Greg Gianforte has appointed Deputy Director Mandy Rambo as acting leader of the Department of Commerce. 

New Treasury Department numbers show that soaring federal handouts for wind and solar dwarf all other energy-related provisions in the tax code and will cost taxpayers $421 billion by 2034.

The 10-year cost of federal tax expenditures for wind and solar has increased 21-fold since 2015, according to a report in Substack.

In 2005, Scientific American published an article saying that the hockey stick graph published a few years earlier by Michael Mann, an academic who now works at the University of Pennsylvania, had become “an iconic symbol of humanity’s contribution to global warming.”

Mann and the hockey stick have become defining examples of the politicization of climate science.

The staggering cost of the subsidies Congress has given to Big Wind, Big Solar, and other alt-energy outfits in the name of climate change. In late November, the Treasury Department published the newest edition of its annual report on tax expenditures, which it says are “revenue losses attributable to provisions of Federal tax laws.”

Those credits, which are the principal drivers behind the deployment of wind and solar energy, and a handful of other forms of alt-energy, are, by far, the most expensive energy-related provisions in the federal tax code. Between 2025 and 2034, the ITC and PTC will account for more than half of all energy-related tax provisions. And that total does not include the tax credits for electric vehicles.

The Yellowstone Board of County Commissioners passed a resolution increasing the  inmate reimbursement rate for Montana Department of Corrections an Federal inmates, held at the Yellowstone County Detention Facility (YCDF). The Montana rate will increase from $82.80 to $117 per inmate/day. The Federal government rate will increase from $85 to $117 per inmate day.

For several years, YCDF has been reimbursed a daily rate per inmate less than actual cost. Approximately 10+ years ago, the State of Montana provided their formula to Yellowstone County to calculate daily inmate rate. Since that time, the Board of County Commissioners and the Sheriff’s Office have attempted to recover actual inmate costs from the state. Montana officials have always claimed Yellowstone County improperly calculated the rate and imposed a rate set by the Legislature. The result has been Yellowstone County taxpayers subsidizing the State to hold their prisoners.

Over the past year, Commissioners, Sheriff’s Office and County Attorney’s office have worked to make YCDF and the criminal justice system, in Yellowstone County, operate more efficiently. While this has helped, it has not relieved pressure on the jail. YCDF routinely houses an average of 575-600+ inmates/day. On average, YCDF houses 50+/- DOC inmates and 50+/- Federal inmates per day.

The effective date of this resolution will be April 1, 2025. This provides an opportunity for the Montana Legislature, during this session to take appropriate action, states the press release.

What havoc is inflation inflicting upon the budget of Yellowstone County? What aspects of county operations place the greatest pressure on its budget? Why are there fewer concerts at Metra Park this year? How will the purchase of gravel mines save the County untold millions? How will a new technology circumvent the mischief of inmates?  Why does the new arraignment court need $45,000?

The answers to all of these questions came during the mid-year budget hearing before the County Commissioners last week. The mid-year look at the budget is aimed at making adjustments to the budget needed by unexpected costs or shifting surpluses in one area to another to serve more pressing needs.

Inflation Big Issue

“Each County fund is feeling the inflationary pressure on their budget,” reported Jennifer Jones, County Finance Director, “Cost of living increases, equipment purchases, food and medical insurance costs continue to be the main areas impacted by the current environment.” 

Wages and demands of the Youth Services Center are putting some of the greatest pressure on the county’s budget, as are other aspects of public safety.

The county budget for FY 2024-25 is based on total projected revenues of $134,460,994.

Investment yields are continuing to hold a “bit higher” than was expected at the beginning of fiscal year (July 1, 2024) and are predicted to remain elevated through this fiscal year (ending June 30, 2025).

Jones reiterated an issue that has plagued county governments for many years. Under state law, local governments are allowed to increase budgets only half the rate of inflation. While difficult, local governments dealt with the limitation when inflation was low, but now that it is high it has become very difficult. “This is especially true when a significant portion of expenditures is dictated by salaries which are driven by the current inflation environment,” said Jones.

She stressed, “It is important the County takes an active interest in the 2025 legislative session. . . with extra attention spent on these bills impacting local taxation reform.” Jones commented that no one knows what the Legislature is going to do – “there are several scenarios floating around Helena” – but no matter what “the funding structure isn’t going to be the same.”

2.5- 3% Tax Growth

Growth is estimated for FY 2026 at 2.5 – 3.0 percent about the same. It has been growing at a rate of about 3 percent and is expected to come in next year at 2.9 percent.

Jones noted that Phillips 66 is protesting their taxes this year, as they did last year. When taxes are protested the tax must be paid but it must be held in a separate account and is not spent until the case is decided.

The county’s General Fund, which had $13,344,775 at the end of 2024, is projected to end this fiscal year with about $2.3 million less than it did last year, or with $12,908,535. Jones called the decline “erosion” resulting from the decline in the value of a dollar or, in other words, inflation.  The general fund is used to shore up other funds in the county budget, as needed.

Public Safety

Public safety continues to be a leading focus for Yellowstone County. A criminal justice needs assessment study began a year ago and is expected to be completed this spring. It will provide recommendations to the county commissioners for system efficiency improvements, capacity management and enhanced outcomes for both adults and youths involved in the system, said Jones. Also impacting public safety issues will be actions in the Montana State Legislature.

The three county funds expected to be most impacted by pending changes, said Jones, will be the Sheriff’s fund, the County Attorney fund and the Youth Services Center (holding facility for young offenders).  Jones emphasized that the expansion of these three entities will need to be supported by a voter-approved public safety levy in which debt obligation will be an option.

Youth Services receives approximately $1.5 million from the General Fund support primarily because of food costs, medical costs and utilities. Commissioners discussed the growing demand on the Youth Services Center, as each year they see more young people incarcerated – and most are from Yellowstone County.

Sheriff’s Vehicles

Sheriff Mike Linder explained his department’s request for additional funding has to do with vehicle replacements. Over the past few years patrol car replacement has not been happening even though he has been ordering them because of disruptions in that industry. (Patrol cars must be specially configured.) Linder said that he had not even planned for them in 2025, but has been notified that a past order will be filled this year. He is requesting a $440,000 adjustment from his contingency budget to pay for them. He said he does not plan to order any replacement vehicles in 2026.

The Sheriff commented that his department has been “very frugal.” The only other request for the Sheriff’s department was to transfer $12,000 to help pay for the overtime in covering vacancies in the records department.

The Yellowstone County Detention Facility requested $25,000 to purchase security cameras, which were actually a part of last year’s budget that was rolled over into this year’s.

Malicious Behavior

The county’s facility manager, Superintendent, Tim Kaczmarek, reported that he has found a new technology that will solve a chronic and costly problem for the Yellowstone County Detention Facility. It has been the malicious practice of inmates of the jail to tear up their cloths and bedding into strips and flush them down the toilets. The materials plug up the sewer lines, requiring shutting down the whole system and engaging maintenance crews to unplug the lines at considerable cost, which at a very minimum amounts to $10,000. That doesn’t include the costs of additional staff time and other impacts, said Kaczmarek.

He has found an affordable electronic mechanism that once installed will shut down the whole system anytime a toilet is flushed more than once in five minutes, he said.

County Attorney

Because of the erosion in the value of the dollar, the County Attorney’s office is having to operate on a higher budget, although costs are being somewhat mitigated because they have not been able to fill all their open positions on their staff for the past 18 months, explained County Attorney Scott Twito. He said that they are learning how to work around that and are gaining some efficiencies.

Jones commented that while the County Attorney’s office will need no General Fund support in 2025, next year in 2026, it may.

Commissioner Mark Morse commended Twito for his lead in establishing the Criminal Justice Coordinating Committee (CJCC) which has been studying the needs of the county’s justice system to deal with the rise in crime. “We are learning you just can’t build a jail,” commented Morse, “You have to get all the other components working efficiently. I am willing to support expansion of the jail so long as we are efficient in all other capacities.”

Arraignment Court

Justice of the Peace David Carter gave commissioners an update regarding the development of an arraignment court that he and his staff have been developing. The court will allow those arrested on primarily misdemeanor crimes to appear before a judge for adjudication within 72 hours of arrest. Judge Carter said that they are in the process of testing the process and will likely be able to become operational within a matter of a few weeks. He asked that $45,000 for the court be added to his budget.

Carter said that while it is seldom noted, Justice Court actually generates some income, which helps its operations. He said that its income has increased 11.33 percent, with having generated $1,017,000 in 2023 and $1,133,000 in 2024.

Commissioner Morse commented that he believed the arraignment court, once operational will “pay for itself,” and thanked Carter and those who have been working to develop it, for their hard work.

Gravel Mines

The Road Department and Bridge Department budgets are stable year to year, although the Bridge Department is focused on a large bridge project, this year.

The County has purchased two gravel mines, which Commissioner John Ostlund said they had been trying to do for quite a while.  They have purchased the Gable Pit at Huntley and another further north in the county. Ostlund said that they had been purchasing gravel from Gable, but they will now own it. Having these two options available to them will save the county “untold millions of dollars over the next 50 years,” said Ostlund.

Fewer Concerts?

There have been fewer concerts at Mera Park this year, reported Tim Wombolt, Accountant for Metra Park, which has negatively impacted its bottom line. The majority of the income for the county -owned venue is derived from concerts.

Wombolt said that the reason for the reduced number of concerts stems from the fact that so few performers have been on tour. Why they haven’t been touring, he said, “we aren’t exactly sure.” But it seems to be loosening up so they hope to get some concerts soon.

 “If they aren’t out there touring,” he said, “we have no ability to get them.”

Metra Park has hosted three concerts this year, but fall about six or seven short of those projected in their budget. Revenues, so far this fiscal year are off about $1.5 million. Net revenues for Metra Park have increased from $2,851,281 in 2020 to $5,889,424 in 2024.

Metra Park Manager Stoney Field said that they hope to get some concerts that will perform outside , which means they do not have to share any of the sales with Oak View Group (OVG), a company with which MetraPark contracted to secure concerts. The contract gives OVG a percentage of any concert held in the First Interstate Arena whether or not they secured the contract. 

The agreement, which runs through 2026, has not been very beneficial for Metra Park. Commissioner John Ostlund admitted the county was outmaneuvered in writing the contract and “there is not an out.” OVG’s performance is based on their ability to “influence” a concert to perform in Billings, and that could amount to nothing more than a follow up phone call after MetraPark staff has acquired the event. “They take credit for every event in that building,” said Ostlund. In the past the county has been paying OVG between $400,000 and $500,000 annually.

From the conversation it was clear that there is no plan to renew the contract with OVG once it is concluded.

Metra Park is seeking transfers to their budget of about $73,000 to help meet a number of needs including maintenance needs, temporary employment wages, cooler repair, food costs, software and contract services. They are also seeking $62,000 from their contingency fund for repairs to their scrapper/loader.

The Tax Foundation recently released its 2025 State Competitiveness Index. This study revealed which states are taxpayer-friendly for both individuals and businesses. States are ranked based on income, sales, excise, property, capital gains, corporate, payroll, estate, and VAT consumption taxes. The Tax Foundation found that Wyoming is the most taxpayer-friendly state, Montana is 5th, Idaho is 11th, and Washington is 45th.

Wyoming was the top-ranking state for the fifth year in a row mostly because of its lack of corporate or individual income tax. Additionally, it has no inventory, franchise, occupation, or value-added taxes. It also enjoys tax exemptions for manufacturers and data centers. Wyoming has the luxury of having no corporate or personal income tax due to significant tax revenue from minerals. Although Wyoming’s exact tax model can’t be copied, its principles can be applied everywhere.

Idaho improved from its prior ranking of 16th to 11th. This can be attributed to its individual and corporate tax rates declining from 5.8% to 5.695%. Idaho has no statewide property tax (local tax only), no estate tax, and a 33-cent gas tax. Idaho currently collects $4,541 in state and local tax collections per capita. Idaho can improve its ranking by lowering individual income taxes even more.

Montana has an individual income tax ranging from 4.7% to 5.9%. Montana has a relatively low tax burden with a property tax rate of 0.69%, no estate tax, and a 33.75 cent gas tax. Montana collects $5,065 in state and local tax collections per capita. Montana has been trending in the right direction by passing multiple tax cuts in the 2023 legislative sessions. Included was lowering the income tax ceiling from 6.75% to 5.9%, increasing the small business exemptions from $100,000 in 2021 to now almost $1 million in 2024, and lowering the capital gains tax to make Montana the 4th lowest in the country. Gov. Gianforte recently announced that he plans to reduce the state income tax even more to 4.9%.

A report compiled by the Montana Section of the American Society of Civil Engineers gave Montana relatively poor grades in the state of its infrastructure. They ranked Montana in 14 categories ranging from bridges and roads to schools to airports to wastewater systems.

Montana received a C grade in 11 categories: aviation, bridges, dams, drinking water, energy, hazardous waste, public parks, rail roads, solid waste and waste water. C means mediocre and requires attention.

Montana received a D grade in two categories, schools and stormwater, which indicated they are poor and at risk. The final category, broadband, received an incomplete grade.

The state’s highest ranking, a C+, went to the rails category.

The state’s schools earned a D in the report due primarily to aging buildings and facilities.

“The challenges are further compounded by rising energy costs and declining student enrollment, placing additional strain on already tight school budgets. As a result, Montana’s schools are struggling to meet the demands of their aging infrastructure while providing a safe and healthy learning environment for students,” the report stated.

Methane emissions from the largest oil- and natural gas-producing basins fell 44% between 2011 and 2013, according to newly published data from the Environmental Protection Agency.

According to the EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, methane emissions dropped in seven oil- and natural gas-producing basins by up to 87% from 2019-2023.

The drop occurred as U.S. domestic producers, led by Texas, broke records over the past few years, producing “more crude oil than any country, ever,” according to the US Energy Information Agency, The Center Square reported.

“Burning natural gas for energy results in fewer emissions of nearly all types of air pollutants and carbon dioxide (CO2) than burning coal or petroleum products to produce an equal amount of energy,” the EIA reports. “About 117 pounds of CO2 are produced per million British thermal units (MMBtu) equivalent of natural gas compared with more than 200 pounds of CO2 per MMBtu of coal and more than 160 pounds per MMBtu of distillate fuel oil.”

Facilities operating in two basins reported methane intensity emissions drops of more than 50% from 2019-2023: the Williston Basin (located in Montana, North and South Dakota), and the Appalachian Basin (spanning across Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, Kentucky, Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania and New York).

This is after methane emissions dropped by more than 75% and production increased by more than 345% over a 10-year period, The Center Square reported.