By Mark Stricherz, The Center Square

Since 2020, fraudsters have scammed at least $36 billion and as much as $3 trillion in tax money from federal entitlement programs, dwarfing the amount federal prosecutors claim was stolen in Minnesota’s federal food aid scandal known as Feeding Our Future, an investigation by The Center Square found.

The Center Square reviewed all the statements about entitlement fraud cases issued by the U.S. Department of Justice from 2020 to last year, which did not include many of the cases prosecuted by U.S. Attorney’s offices in the various districts and any state prosecutions.

Public safety net programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid lost billions of dollars to scams each year, according to a review of 2,500 DOJ statements, press releases, and fact sheets. The amount ranged from $2.7 billion in 2022 to $14.5 billion in 2025.  

Fraud experts said, if anything, the $36 billion figure is too low. 

“The number doesn’t surprise me,” said Linda Miller, president and co-founder of the Program Integrity Alliance, an independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that seeks to strengthen government integrity through data, evidence, and public-sector innovation. “That’s fraud that has been identified and investigated, so it represents a fraction of the actual fraud that has occurred or is occurring. Fraud is deceptive, and most agencies lack the tools to proactively prevent it, meaning the actual amount of fraud is much higher.” 

Entitlement fraud has been in the news since November when the Manhattan Institute published an article about mostly Somali residents indicted for defrauding at least $250 million in federal food aid programs with allegations that some of the money went to fund terrorists in al-Shabaab.

Matt Weidinger, a senior fellow at the conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute, said in an interview that “(w)hatever the fraud that has been uncovered (in Minnesota) is doubtless a fraction of the fraud occurring nationwide.”

He cited a 2024 U.S. Government Accountability Office report concluding that, based on data from 2018 to 2022, the federal government is defrauded of $233 billion to $521 billion annually. While the report examined federal spending overall, Weidinger noted that “entitlement programs constitute the bulk of federal spending and presumably fraud, too.”

The public assistance that suffered the most from the fraud was Medicare and Medicaid, according to a review of Justice Department announcements. In the first half of last year alone, the agency announced that it had identified and investigated approximately $14 billion in fraud in the two federal health care programs, as well as Tricare, the health care program primarily for active-duty military, retirees, and their families.

The figure is more than twice the $6 billion in fraud to federal health programs that the Justice Department identified in September 2020.

The U.S. Sentencing Commission, an independent federal judicial body, concluded that from 2020 to 2024, health care fraud offenses increased by nearly 20 percent.

Fraud prosecutions around the U.S. 

While government officials and experts agree that fraud in Minnesota is substantial, the $250 million figure found in the indictments would barely rank among the ten largest alleged scams from 2020 to last year. Since the Feeding Our Future scandal was announced on September 21, 2022, six other alleged frauds have been larger, with some having nearly as many defendants.

Last month alone, the Justice Department announced two developments in scams centered in Maricopa County, Arizona.

On Dec. 22, Gary Cox, CEO of Power Mobility Doctor Rx, was sentenced to fifteen years in prison and forced to pay $452 million in restitution for defrauding Medicare of $1 billion. According to the Justice Department, Cox and 78 co-conspirators targeted hundreds of thousands of Medicare beneficiaries and convinced them to sign up for medically unneeded pain creams and orthotic braces through misleading mailers, television ads and from offshore call centers.

On Dec. 12, Alexandra Gehrke and her husband, Jeffrey King, agreed to pay $309 million in restitution for defrauding Medicare, Medicaid and Tricare of $900 million from 2022 to 2024. Known as the “glam-flam couple,” they administered unnecessary wound grafts that were ordered because of illegal kickbacks and applied to elderly and terminally ill patients. Each has been sentenced to more than a dozen years behind bars.

Earlier, two medical professionals were convicted of defrauding federal medical entitlement programs.

On March 6, Dehshid Nourian, a Texas pharmacist, forfeited $405 million in assets for defrauding and laundering money from federal workers. According to the Justice Department, Nourian and two other men defrauded the Department of Labor through the submission of fraudulent claims for prescription compound creams to injured federal workers. He was sentenced to 17 years and six months in prison.

In September 2021, Dr. Francisco Patino of Wayne County, Michigan, was convicted of submitting more than $250 million of false and fraudulent claims submitted to Medicaid, Medicare, and other health insurance programs.

According to the Justice Department, Patino excessively prescribed highly addictive opioids to his patients at his medical clinic in Livonia, prescriptions that forced his patients to receive lucrative spinal injections. If patients refused, Patino would take away their opioid prescriptions, prosecutors alleged. While another 21 defendants were sentenced in the conspiracy, Patino received the stiffest sentence—16.5 years in prison.

In December 2022, Minal Patel of Atlanta, owner of LabSolutions LLC, was convicted of defrauding Medicare of $463 million. According to the Justice Department, Patel conspired with patient brokers, telemedicine companies, and call centers to target Medicare beneficiaries with calls falsely stating that Medicare covered expensive cancer genetic tests. In August 2023, Patel was sentenced to 27 years in prison.

In September 2022, Biogen Inc., a Cambridge, Mass-based biopharmaceutical firm, reached a $900 million settlement for defrauding Medicare and Medicaid.  According to a whistleblower’s complaint, from January 2009 to March 2014 Biogen gave speaker honoraria, training fees, consulting fees and meals to medical professionals who spoke or attended the company’s programs to convince them to prescribe three of its drugs to treat multiple sclerosis.

As large as those entitlement frauds were, even they scratch the surface of the nearly 300 cases the Justice Department announc-ed from 2020 to last year. Most were announcements of convictions, guilty pleas, and sentencing. They involved not only doctors and medical firms, but also universities, hospitals, corporations, bookkeepers, accountants and state agencies.  

Fraud experts reject the notion that scams are the natural byproduct of government contracts and oversight.

In a 2023 article, Miller wrote that cabinet officials and agency leaders should be held responsible for the fraud under their watch. 

“Fraud is unfortunately not an issue many agency leaders prioritize,” she said in an interview, “and the number of programs that have scaled up their preventative tools and capabilities is woefully small.”

Feds crack down in MN

On Dec. 18, Joe Thompson, then the acting U.S. Attorney for Minnesota, said scam artists have defrauded the state’s fourteen Medicaid programs of more than $9 billion. Governor Tim Walz, a Democrat, disputes the figure, though in October he announced that the state would delay fourteen Medicaid payments run by the state’s Department of Human Services.  

Since the fall, the Trump administration has seized on entitlement fraud in Minnesota, a state where Democrats occupy all the statewide elected offices and hold a narrow majority in the state senate. On Sept. 21, 2022, the Justice Department announced it indicted 47 defendants for committing $250 million of alleged fraud in a federally funded child nutrition program run by the nonprofit organization Feeding Our Future.  

Minnesota’s office of the legislative auditor released two detailed reports on fraud, on the federal-state childcare assistance program in 2019, and two federal food aid programs in 2024, both of which found fault with state agencies failing to detect scams earlier. Yet the chicanery did not become national news until this fall.  

On Nov. 19,  an article by the Manhattan Institute alleged that the defendants, nearly all of whom were Somali, were sending some of the stolen entitlement money to Al Shabaab, an Islamic terrorist group fighting the government in a decades-long civil war in one of the poorest countries on earth. Two days later, President Trump announced on TruthSocial that he was terminating temporary protected status for Somalis in Minnesota, a designation given to them because the Horn of Africa nation suffered from not only civil war but also famine. 

The think tank’s accusations of diversions of the money to terrorists have not been proven, but the scandal hit a fever pitch after conservative populist influencer Nick Shirley on Dec. 26 posted a YouTube video of Somali-run daycare centers in Minnesota devoid of children. The video received more than 100 million views. 

On Jan. 5, the Trump administration froze federal subsidies for childcare, social services, and cash support for poor families in five states, all controlled by Democrats, including Minnesota. 

On Jan. 8, Vice President J.D. Vance announced the administration would create a new assistant attorney general for fraud detection — a position based in the White House.

While national in scope the official will “focus primarily” on Minnesota’s fraud scandals. 

By Diogo Costa

President, Foundation for Economic Education

At Davos, Javier Milei declared Machiavelli dead.

The Argentine president’s speech was an extended argument against what he called a “false dilemma”: the idea that when designing public policy, one must choose between efficiency and justice, between what works and what is right. Milei insisted that free enterprise capitalism must be defended not merely as productive but as just. “Today’s socialists,” he observed, quoting Israel Kirzner, “do not deny the superiority of capitalism in production. They question it for being unjust.”

Milei is largely right. There is a concession that friends of freedom make far too readily. When confronted with socialism’s appeal, they retreat to a familiar line, one that even Thomas Sowell, quoted by Milei, has employed: socialism “sounds very nice” but “always ends badly.” The implication is that socialism possesses some genuine moral nobility—a concern for the poor, a vision of human solidarity, a rejection of greed—while markets are merely a compromise with the flawed reality of human nature.

I have always hated this concession. .  because it is false. It gets the intellectual history exactly backwards. And in getting it backwards, it surrenders the moral high ground that classical liberalism has occupied from its very foundations.

To say that socialism is “good in theory but bad in practice” treats practice as something accidental, like an implementation problem, a matter of getting the details right. But what are these practical failures? The knowledge problem. The distortion of incentives. The concentration of power. The politicization of economic life. These are not bugs in an otherwise sound system. They are what the system actually is.

The “practical” problems that appear as obstacles to socialism’s realization are the very mechanisms through which any attempt at socialism must operate. A theory requiring planners to possess knowledge they cannot have, people to ignore the incentives they face, and power to be exercised without abuse is not a good theory poorly implemented. It is a bad theory. In a market society, if your employer or landlord violates your rights, you can appeal to the courts for redress. But if the state is your employer, landlord, educator, and healthcare provider, there is no Archimedean point from which to contest its decisions. Democratic socialism is a contradiction in terms: democracy presupposes organized opposition, which presupposes independent resource bases, which socialism eliminates by definition.

Nevertheless, in the popular imagination, socialism has become synonymous with moral idealism and liberalism with cold calculation. Socialism cares about people while capitalism cares about profit. Socialism has a vision of human dignity while economic liberalism has spreadsheets. The socialist dreams; the economist counts.

This is not merely wrong. It is the precise inversion of the intellectual history. I find this inversion genuinely baffling.

Consider the foundations of modern liberal thought. John Locke grounded political society in natural rights: the inherent dignity of persons that precedes and constrains political authority. Adam Smith, before he wrote about the wealth of nations, wrote about the moral sentiments, arguing that human sociability rests on our capacity for sympathy and our desire for the approval of an impartial spectator. Immanuel Kant gave us the categorical imperative: that we must treat humanity, in our own person and in others, always as an end and never merely as a means.

Those insights are its historical foundations. The entire edifice of natural rights, limited government, and free exchange rests on a moral vision of human beings as dignified, purposive, creative agents whose projects and values deserve respect.

Now consider the foundations of socialist theory… Instead of offering an alternative moral vision, Marx rejected moral discourse altogether. Morality, in the Marxist framework, is “superstructure.” It is ideology produced by material conditions to serve class interests. Justice, rights, dignity: these are bourgeois constructions, tools of the ruling class, veils over exploitation. They have no independent validity. The revolutionary does not appeal to justice; he understands that justice is whatever serves the historical movement toward communism.

I am not constructing a strawman here. This is the explicit theoretical position. Engels mocked “eternal truths” of morality as metaphysical nonsense. Lenin treated ethics as entirely subordinate to the class struggle. The entire tradition is one of moral deflationism, if not outright moral nihilism.

And yet socialism is remembered as the idealistic philosophy, the one that cared about human beings, while economic liberalism is cast as the soulless doctrine of efficiency and accumulation. I have always found remarkable that after all these years, people still associate socialism with morality, when the very basis of socialist theory is denying that morality, as traditionally understood, even exists.

Part of the reason is rhetorical. Socialists spoke constantly of exploitation, alienation, liberation. They employed the language of moral urgency. That this urgency rested on a philosophy denying the independent reality of moral claims was a subtlety lost on most audiences (including many socialists themselves).

But just as important was the classical liberal drift from thick to thin economics. Confident in their moral foundations, economists sometimes neglected to articulate them, focusing instead on demonstrating the efficiency of markets, the productivity of free enterprise, the correlation between economic freedom and prosperity. These are important arguments. But when they become the only arguments, economic liberalism begins to sound like exactly what its critics accuse it of being: an optimization problem dressed up as a political philosophy.

The tragedy is that classical liberals internalized the critique. Too many friends of freedom half-believe that they have traded something noble for something merely effective, that we have chosen prosperity over justice, efficiency over dignity. I see this all the time: the defensive crouch, the apologetic tone, the implicit admission that yes, capitalism may be cold, but at least it works. This is the concession we must refuse.

Milei referenced the economist and historian Deirdre McCloskey. McCloskey has argued that the commercial society emerging after 1800 through the Great Enrichment that lifted billions out of poverty was not a triumph of efficiency over dignity. It was the opposite. It happened precisely because ordinary people began to be accorded dignity. When the projects of common men and women were granted respect, when their experiments and enterprises were permitted rather than crushed, when their consent was treated as meaningful and their creativity as valuable—then, and only then, did the sustained growth that defines modernity become possible.

Dignity and dynamism are not competing values. They are complementary. The recognition of human beings as self-directing agents, as sources of value rather than factors to be optimally arranged, is both the moral foundation of classical liberalism and the engine of its prosperity.

This is what thick economics understands. . .Property rights as recognitions that persons have projects, that their labor and choices matter, that the fruits of their creativity belong to them. Voluntary exchange as a practice of consent, a continuous affirmation that other people’s values and purposes are real and worthy of respect. The entrepreneur. . .  not as an algorithm arbitraging price discrepancies, but as a discoverer of possibilities, a creator of options that did not exist before.

Milei is right that the defense of free enterprise must be moral, not merely utilitarian. But we should be clear about what this means. It does not mean that economists must now scramble to find ethical foundations they previously lacked. It means recovering foundations that socialism never possessed and could never possess, because its theoretical commitments preclude them.

We do not defend markets despite their justice. We defend them because of it.

Commercial

City Of Billings The|Dick Anderson Construction, 2251 Belknap Ave, Com Remodel, $3,500,000

Teamsters Bldg Organization|Montana Residential Builders, 437 Kuhlman Dr, Com Remodel, $135,000

JDW Propertyllc|American Concrete, 4900 Laurel Rd, Demolition Permit Commercial, $20,000

Ratcliff Joseph R Trustee|Lennick Bros. Roofing & Sheetmetal, 123 S 29th St, Com Fence/Roof/Siding, $7,500

Target C0op T-1333|Engineered Structures Inc 403 Main St, Com Remodel, $3,790,044

Missions United Inc|Langlas & Assoc. Inc., 1213 Wyndstone Court, Com New 3+ (Multi Family), $867,326

Missions United Inc|Langlas & Assoc. Inc., 1214 Wyndstone Court, Com New 3+ (Multi Family), $867,326

Missions United Inc|Langlas & Assoc. Inc., 1219 Siesta Ave, Com New 3+ (Multi Family), $867,326

Dollar General |Starnes Contracting LLC, 2402 Grand Ave, Com Remodel, $215,000

Yellowstone Bank|Empire Roofing Inc 1411 13th St W, Com Fence/Roof/Siding, $32,000 

Erin Kirschenmann |KE Construction LLC, 1990 Zimmerman Trl, Com Remodel, $79,590

Residential

Formation Inc|Formation Inc, 2511 Silver Pine Ct, Res New Single Family, $450,000

Infinity Home Llc |Infinity Home Llc, 949 Madrid Dr, Res New Single Family, $400,000

Mark Burzynski |Freyenhagen Construction Inc, 1735 Forest Park Dr, Res Remodel Single/Duplex/Garage, $203,800

Cole Matthew Elwyn & Heide M, 2430 Hoover Ave, Res Remodel Single/Duplex/Garage, $59,472

Iris Modlin, 3161 N Daffodil Dr, Res Remodel Single/Duplex/Garage, $42,105

Michael Christensen, 290 Arstein Canal Ln, Res Plan Revision, $3,600

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 845 Waikiki Way, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 832 Honolulu Ln, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 840 Waikiki Way, Res New Two Family $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC 831 Honolulu Ln, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC 837 Waikiki Way, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 824 Honolulu Ln, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 832 Waikiki Way, Res New Two Family $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 823 Honolulu Ln, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 829 Waikiki Way, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 816 Honolulu Ln, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 824 Waikiki Way, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 815 Honolulu Ln, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 821 Waikiki Way, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 808 Honolulu Ln, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 816 Waikiki Way, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 807 Honolulu Ln, Res New Two Family, $350,000

Big Island LLC|ABCO Billings LLC, 809 Waikiki Way, Res New Two Family, $350,000

HAD Inc|HAD Inc, 852 El Rancho Dr, Res New Single Family, $252,984

Logan International Field, the airport that serves Billings, is destined to grow, with airport officials looking at a $110 million capital improvement plan, including $20 million in projects in 2026. The airport hit a record in passengers served, a trend that is expected to continue, and its leadership is taking a hard look at how the facility will be administered in the future.

Such were some of the unveilings at a Community Air Service Breakfast in Billings, on January 20.

Jeff Roach, Director of Aviation and Transit at the airport, stated that leadership at the airport and in Billings is working to provide more and better service to the community and the area. Adding more flights and “bringing our facilities up to date” is the overall goal, he said, noting that “a lot has changed since 9-11.” The tragedy of that day forced the industry to look at how things were done and to improve facilities.

At the Billings airport, said Roach, they are focused on their infrastructure, “making sure that aircraft have a place to operate.”

John Brewer, President & CEO of the Billings Chamber of Commerce, emphasized that “the airport directly impacts our community.” The airport serves every aspect of Billings’ including  businesses,  healthcare, tourism and communities for the whole of eastern Montana.  The airport is a “point of pride,” said Brewer, explaining that the community has an Air Service Committee, led by Brian Brown, that is focused on improving Billings’ air service.

The Capital Improvement Plan, being prepared by Morrison & Maierle, is about three –fourths completed and expected to be completed by fall. One public hearing has been held to gather community input and another hearing will be held before it is completed.

The master plan is aimed at addressing future aviation demand by enhancing infrastructure, and responding to community needs, as well as maximizing profitability. It was noted that the expansion and remodeling of the airport is being done without the necessity of tax dollars. Revenue for the projects has been generated by tickets sales and enterprise funds.

Roach said that the airport has been self-sufficient since the 1970s.

The facility has, in fact, grown so much and gained such financial stability that it may justify its administration being transferred from the City to an airport authority. The City of Billings approved a $621,000 expenditure to hire a consultant to research the possibility of transitioning the management of Billings Logan International Field from the City to an airport authority. A report is expected in May.

An airport authority is an independent entity charged with the operation and oversight of an airport. Billings is the only major airport in the state that isn’t administered by an authority.

“We anticipate a recommendation to move to an airport authority,” said Rauch, adding that “the traveling public won’t see much of a difference. The change will be in the long term, in becoming more efficient and offering more services at a lower cost.”

A top need for the Billings Airport that is largely recognized by everyone is that of parking. Rauch said that they are short between 250 – 300 parking spaces. The plan is to build a parking garage, which is very expensive, said Rauch – estimated at $31 million. Also in the planning is shuttle parking which is expected to be available by the end of summer.

One of the more immediate projects is the renovation of the ticket counters , which haven’t been changed for the past 30 years. There will be 27 counters which will be moved further to the rear. The baggage area will also be modernized.

A $6 million runway project is also in the immediate plans in order to lengthen and strengthen a segment of runway to handle the larger aircraft.

Another project will be to build a pond to hold storm water for all the airport development. There will also be six additional taxi lanes built to serve the nine new hangers that have been built over the past three years. Rehabilitating cargo ramps, asphalt improvements and water line improvements are also in the plans.

Jay Richardson, a research engineer from Mead & Hunt of Madison, Wisconsin, talked about the ups and downs and trends of the airline industry and how it is impacting Billings. 

The Billings airport hit a new record, serving one million passengers, last year, with the expectation of increasing somewhat above that in 2026. Billings is on the cusp of becoming a small hub airport, said Richardson. It is that growth that is pushing the need for the Billings airport to grow and renovate.

Richardson said that airlines are shifting to larger planes with more seats, providing more comfort and offering more non-stop flights.

Addressing a common lament heard about fares in Billings as compared to Bozeman, Brewer said that the complaints really aren’t justified. Bozeman does offer more nonstop destinations – 25 of them – compared to Billings’ 16 nonstop routes, but Billings’ average airfare is $242 compared to $239 in Bozeman, and to Kalispell’s $238. It’s about the same. Sure, he said, there are chances of finding good deals but in general the fares are pretty much aligned. Airport leadership in Billings is working diligently to increase flight options.

The load factor for Billings flights is at 81 percent, which Richardson said is good. As more seats are added they are being filled which is a “good trend for Billings.”

Los Angeles is a large market that is underserved, said Richardson — in fact California in general is underserved out of Billings.

Going forward, said Richardson, the focus is to expand service to Los Angeles and San Francisco; in general get more seats, depths of schedules and more flights for Billings, and get more service to Boise, Burbank and Orange County – and to enhance marketing in places like Chicago.

By Bella Folino, Montana Farmers Union

Government & Outreach Coordinator

With snow on the ground and the temperature in the negatives, where can you find fresh produce grown in Montana? Swanky Roots in Billings has utilized quaponics to keep the growing season going all year round.

Swanky Roots was started in 2016 by mother- daughter team, Rona Klamert and Veronnaka Evenson.

Construction of the site took time and it wasn’t until 2019 for them to be in production.

“I had originally wanted to start smaller, but luckily my mom had a vision,” said Evenson. “She said that we would have to eventually expand, so we might as well start here.”

It was originally Klamert’s idea to try this style of operation. After seeing the idea on line, she reached out to her daughter to see if she was interested. Evenson’s background from her degrees in plant science and ag education from MSU –Bozeman gave her some technical knowledge, even though it was different than what she envisioned.

“My family is in the cattle and wheat / corn industry, so I thought I would be doing something like that. When my Mom asked me about aquaponics, my first thought was: there is no way that will work,” said Evenson, “Then I thought, well, there is no one else doing this, so maybe it is the perfect idea.”

What is

aquaponics?

Aquaponics is the combination of aquaculture and hydroponics. Aquaculture is the cultivation of aquaorganisms, in this case fish. Hydroponics is the process of growing plants without soil. The benefit of combining these two practices is that the facility’s only input into their system is the food for the fish.

First step of the process is the aquaculture. The fish are kept in separate tanks where they are fed. There are about 16 tanks with 200 to 500 fish in each.

“What we look for in fish is compatibility in water temperature,” said Evenson. “The plants do best in warm water, so we need fish that do that too.”

Swanky Roots originally started with raising bluegill. In 2023, they switched to raising coi.

The coi became a more efficient choice because it takes less of them to get the same results. Previously, there were about 1000 bluegill in each tank, for a total of 15,000- 20,000 fish. Now they raise approximately 5,000 coi fish in 12 different varieties.

The water from the pools, containing the fish’s waste, is then moved through pipes to where the lettuce is being grown. This provides the necessary nutrients for the plants to grow.

Each day, Swanky Roots plants and harvests 600- 700 heads of lettuce of seven different varieties.

It takes about 60 days from seed to harvest, sometimes up to 70 days in the winter.

Seeds begin in a rockwool sheet for  10- 15 days until they get their roots. They are then moved to a nutrient film technique gutter for about 20 days.

Once they have more roots, they are moved to floating Styrofoam. The water is constantly aerated to keep the roots from rotting.

“The thing about plants is they still need the same stuff whether they are in soil or water,” said Evenson. “Even though I didn’t study this specifically, I still understand plants and the biology behind it.”

After the water makes its way through all of the rows of lettuce, it is then pumped back into the pools for the fish. This keeps everything on a closed- loop system. “We add about 300 – 500 gallons of water a day,”

“That seems like a lot, but we are able to grow lettuce with seven times less water than used traditionally.”

Success, Struggles

Swanky Roots was founded with a focus on sustained ability. Their system creates and uses its own natural fertilizer and keeps it contained within the system. Due to the nature of the connection between the fish and plants, there are very few things that can be added without harming the other.

“We use the phrase ‘beyond organic’ because we are trying to show people that organic is not just a label, you need to look into the practices,” said Evenson.

Any business does not come without struggles. After the first hurdle of site construction, Swanky Roots had to battle with weather and natural resources. Between extremely cold temperatures and heaters going out to a well going bad, there have been times it has been difficult to keep production running.

“We have had three or four winters, where we almost completely shut down,” said Evenson. “And then when the well went bad we had to put in a major water filtration system, water is our livelihood, and that was an unexpected issue.”

For those interested in a similar system in their own garden there are a lot of possibilities. There are a variety of different fishes that can be used in systems, like catfish, gold fish, or trout. Leafy greens grow easiest, but fruiting vegetables – like tomatoes or peppers – can also be successful.

“If you are doing this on a smaller scale, you can grow just about anything,” said Evenson.

For anyone looking to see the facility at Swanky Roots they are open for tours.

Evenson has also enjoyed doing field trips both for school students and local gardening clubs.

Looking Forward

The greenhouse sits on 60 acres and has about 20,000 feet of indoor growing space. On top of the indoor aquaponic facility, there are also grow beds that utilize clay pebbles and flood irrigation to grow a variety of vegetables from swiss chard to tomatoes.

Swanky Roots was recently able to install led grow lights through a grant and has also received a grant for solar panels they hope to have installed by the winter.

With new grow lights and ideal conditions, the growing process could be cut down to about 30 days. At full production, they could ramp up to 1000 heads a day.

“These will hopefully be a huge help,” said Evenson. “In the winter we have to heat the water close to 75 degrees, even when it is negative 30 outside.”

Swanky Roots is also working on expanding their markets. While they started out primarily at restaurants, they can now be found in grocery stores in Billings, Livingston, and Bozeman.

“I try to keep our prices accessible. Our customers have been great about getting the word out,” said Evenson. “I think the product really speaks for itself.”

They are also involved with the Yellowstone Valley Food Hub and, most recently, the Central Montana Food Hub.

On –site, their products can be found at their farm store in Billings where they sell their produce, beef, and other local ly made goodies.

By Sam Cardwell

Mountain States Policy Center

Across the country, raising the minimum wage continues to be a topic of conversation. Some claim that raising the minimum wage to $20 would help both low-income employees as well as employers. Though some are moving forward with this experiment, others are being more cautious.

For example, voters in Olympia, Wash., this year rejected a ballot measure to raise the minimum wage to $20 an hour. California, however, recently enacted this policy for the fast-food sector with disastrous effects. 

On April 1, 2024, California implemented a $20 minimum wage for fast food employees. To fit this definition, an operation has to offer limited or no table service, and customers pay for the items before they are consumed. Also, the restaurant has to be a part of at least 60 establishments nationwide.

The National Bureau of Economic Research found that California’s fast food minimum wage increase led to a detrimental effect on jobs , totaling around 18,000 jobs lost in the fast-food market in California from September of 2023 to September of 2024.  Relative to the rest of the country, employment in California’s fast-food sector declined by 2.7% more during that time period.

Using the 2023 figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a $20 minimum wage imposition for fast food employees would harm the labor force in every state. Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming should pay attention to these results as they consider similar policies.

Washington state already has a high minimum wage of $16.66 for fast food workers. The industry employs roughly 100,100 fast food employees. Based on the California study, if the state implemented a $20 minimum wage, this would be a 20% increase from its current minimum, resulting in 2,402 jobs lost.

A study done by the Washington Hospitality Association found that eating out in Seattle already costs 17% more than it does on average across 20 major U.S cities. A majority of this unaffordability can be attributed to the high minimum wage, meaning employers have to increase menu prices to make up the cost on their razor-thin profit margin.

Idaho has a minimum wage of $7.25 for fast food workers, and it employs 20,840 workers in the industry. Increasing the minimum wage to $20 would result in 4,395 jobs lost, which would be a major shock to the industry.

Montana has a minimum wage of $9.95 and employs 15,380 fast food employees. With a $20 minimum wage increase, the state would lose about 1,860 jobs. Montana would find itself in a situation that sits right in between the estimated impacts for Washington and Idaho.

Wyoming has a minimum wage of $7.25. The Bureau of Labor Statistics doesn’t have as accurate job numbers for Wyoming and may have suppressed them. This is because Wyoming has a small fast-food employee population, and confidentiality could be breached. The best estimates are around 6,500 fast food jobs. Based on the estimates, a $20 minimum wage would result in a loss of 1,372 fast food jobs.

A simple economic principle is that when the price of something goes up, people will buy less of it. That exact rule applies to labor as well. Large minimum wage increases greatly contribute to job loss. As the wages increase, businesses may be forced to reduce staff to offset higher labor costs, as occurred in California. 

Proposals for large minimum wage increases have become a policy prescription to combat poverty, but they operate on a false premise. It says that raising the minimum wage will improve the well-being of the workers affected, but that is far from the truth. The minimum wage of a fast food worker let go is zero.

States in our region can avoid this outcome. If policymakers really want the best for these fast-food workers, they should avoid proposals that put their jobs in jeopardy. Let California’s failed $20 minimum wage experiment serve as a warning to the rest of the country.

Sam Cardwell is a Policy Analyst for the Mountain States Policy Center, an independent research organization based in Idaho, Montana, Eastern Washington and Wyoming. Online at mountainstatespolicy.org.

By John O’Brien

Legal Newsline

A ballot initiative designed to keep corporations from spending on elections in Montana is a little too ambitious, the state Supreme Court has found.

The new proposals included in Ballot Issue 4 violate the rules for wording such initiatives, the court ruled. State Attorney General Austin Knudsen made that argument to the justices over a vote that would have corporations labeled by the State as “artificial persons.”

The initiative would have said the people of Montana never intended to allow artificial persons to take part in election activity. But it contained other measures, the court ruled, that would leave voters taking on too much – rejecting the idea they were so closely related that voters were deciding essentially a single topic.

“Although BI-4 does not combine unrelated amendments in an attempt to secure support from different groups, it would force voters who support abolishing corporate spending ‘on elections or ballot issues’ to also support, more broadly: 1) limiting the rights of other entities defined as “artificial persons,” such as unincorporated associations and cooperatives; and 2) potentially limiting the powers of such organizations to engage in activities other than election and ballot issue activities in significant but unspecified other ways,” Justice Jim Rice wrote.

Voters must be allowed to express their opinion on each proposed amendment, Rice continued. It’s a loss for Transparent Election Initiative, a group dedicated to fighting against the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which held that corporate spending on political issues is protected under the First Amendment.

The initiative was called its “Montana Plan” – a first-of-its-kind effort to keep “secret-donor money” out of the state’s elections. It didn’t overturn Citizens United, TEI said, it makes it irrelevant.

“It redefines Montana’s corporations as entities that no longer have the power to spend in politics,” the group said. “And if an entity wasn’t given the power to do something by its creator, whether it has a right to do that thing is irrelevant.”

Groups like the Montana Mining Association and the Montana Chamber of Commerce resisted the initiative. MMA said states cannot use semantics to get around the First Amendment and BI-4 was not tailored to a governmental interest.

The Montana Chamber noted BI-4 if passed would be the longest section in the Montana Constitution by triple.

“BI-4 extends it extreme speech restrictions beyond business corporations and nonprofits by including even ‘unincorporated associations,’” the chamber wrote.

“An ‘unincorporated association’ includes just about any association of two or more people – everything from churches and grassroots protest movements to informal social media groups and living-room discussion groups.

“Even so, BI-4 subjects them to absolute prohibitions on political speech, which implicates their rights to free association and free speech.”

This report was produced by Legal Newsline and distributed by The Center Square as part of a content-sharing agreement. 

By Mitch Rolling and Isaac Orr

Energy Bad Boys

The prevailing narrative surrounding the power sector is that America’s grid is short of watts, and that we need to vastly increase our power generation capacity to avoid rolling blackouts and meet surging demand for data centers and reindustrialization.

Given the state of the discourse, it may be hard to believe that America has more installed electricity capacity on its grid than ever before. But it’s true. The problem is, so much of this capacity is from unreliable wind and solar facilities that provide almost no reliability value to the grid.

The U.S. technically has more installed capacity on the U.S. grid than ever before, which has increased by 26 percent since 2004 and 12.5 percent since 2015. Meanwhile, electricity demand has only increased by 8.5 percent and 5.6 percent, respectively, during the same timeframes.

The result is that the country has more capacity (MW) per terrawatt-hour (TWh) of generation than ever before.

If “capacity” was the same across all resource types, this data would suggest that we should be more prepared than ever to meet growing electricity demand stemming from data centers and AI.

But we’re not. In fact, the opposite is true.

This begs the question: If the American grid has so much installed capacity on the system, why is it bracing for such severe supply shortages?

The short answer is that the capacity being built today—wind and solar—is far less reliable than the capacity it is replacing—coal and nuclear.

Put simply, wind and solar capacity is not the same as dispatchable capacity due to their intermittency. Intermittent generators are inferior to dispatchable resources for a number of reasons, but mainly because operators cannot control when they produce electricity and when they won’t.

We can forecast when they will or won’t fairly well (but not always), yet that doesn’t give us control over their production levels similar to traditional resources like coal, natural gas, oil, and nuclear. Not to mention, the entire point of forecasting wind and solar production is so that we can use other “backup” resources to supply demand when they aren’t able to, but this backup generation fleet is being retired more and more every year.

For example, the following chart shows that while intermittent resources like wind and solar have made up the bulk of net resource additions in recent years, firm capacity has been on the decline since 2011 with the exception of a slight rise in 2024.

The result is that the U.S. is now at pre-2005 levels of firm capacity on the grid at a time when electricity demand is projected to have the largest increases in over a decade due to data center and AI growth and electrification efforts.

So, even though the grid as a whole has more capacity than it did 20 years ago, the growth is made up entirely of resources that may be producing no electricity whatsoever when needed the most, and the system has roughly the same levels of firm, reliable capacity online as it did in 2004.

The result of this trend is obvious: supply shortages.

And it’s happening in pretty much every regional grid in the country.

Commercial

SMBC Leasing & Finance Inc|Jones Construction Inc, 1629 King Ave W, Com Remodel, $370,940

Roman Catholic Bishop Of Great|Wegner Homes, 2202 Colton Blvd, Com Remodel, $98,560

Rhett Holyoak |Wagenhals Enterprises Inc, 1722 Lampman Dr, dba CDW Construction, Com Remodel, $70,000

Valley Mt Property Holdings Ll|Western States Fire Protection Co, 1807 24th St W, Com Fire Systems $890,850

Graystoke Capital Highlands Ll| Chrome Construction & Design Highlands, 1101 N 22nd St, Com Addition Multi-Family, $500,000

Zach Harris Dollar Tree, 617 Central Ave, Com Remodel, $250,000

Young Men’s Christian Association|J & S Drywall Construction, 402 N 32nd St, Com Remodel, $4,650

FSS Billings A Plus Storage Ll|Mission Communications Inc dba Mission Wireless, 3213 Grand Ave, Com Remodel, $45,000

Billings Education Association|Montana Piering and Concrete Lifting Foundation, 510 N 29th St, Com Remodel, $42,000

St. Johns Lutheran Ministries | Ben Mitchell Construction Llc, 3940 Rimrock Rd, Com Remodel, $25,000

BK RE 11036 Llc |Environmental Contractors Llc., 4780 King Ave E, Demolition Permit Commercial, $22,800

Jon M Ussin Trust|Lennick Bros. Roofing & Sheetmetal, 219 N 33rd St, Com Fence/ Roof/ Siding, $2,500

Residential

516 7th St W, Kannegiesser Pamela J, Res Addition Single/Duplex/Garage, $10,000

Wells Built Inc. |Wells Built Inc., 2541 Morning Rose Ln, Res New Two Family, $254,598

Wells Built Inc. |Wells Built Inc., 2547 Morning Rose Ln, Res New Two Family, $254,598

Wells Built Inc. |Wells Built Inc., 5504 Trail Creek Dr, Res New Two Family, $254,598

Wells Built Inc. |Wells Built Inc., 5457 Apple Rose Ln, Res New Two Family, $254,598

Wells Built Inc. |Wells Built Inc., 5463 Apple Rose Ln, Res New Two Family, $254,598

Moore Louis R & Phyllis J|Montana Piering and Concrete Lifting, 3103 Stanford Dr, Res  Remodel Single/ Duplex/ Garage, $132,000

Middendorf Virgil T & Becky K, 1642 Natalie St, Res Addition Single/Duplex/Garage, $150,000

Hastings Matthew E & Brenda L|Northwest Consulting and Excavation Llc, 3048 Poly Dr,  Res Addition Single/ Duplex/ Garage, $25,000

Stark Judd D & Tawny L, 1101 Strawberry Ave, Res Remodel Single/ Duplex/ Garage, $10,000

By Andrew Rice

The Center Square

A coalition of 18 attorneys general, led by Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen, called on the nonprofit group As You Sow to end activities that may violate antitrust and consumer protection laws.

As You Sow, a nonprofit shareholder advocacy organization founded in 1992, seeks to “create large-scale systemic change by establishing sustainable and equitable corporate practices.”

In a letter to As You Sow CEO Andrew Behar, the attorneys general said the nonprofit pressures companies to pursue net-zero emissions policies that are incompatible with the production of fossil fuels.

“As You Sow demands artificial transformations of entire markets and sectors, inevitably impacting the output and quality of the goods and services produced by those sectors,” the attorneys general wrote in the letter.

The attorneys general argued As You Sow seeks to implement policies that are aligned with its predetermined agenda, leaving it potentially in violation of antitrust laws. The coalition said the nonprofit attempts to discourage shareholders from investing in fossil fuel companies due to alleged unsustainability.

“As Attorneys General, we have a duty to protect the citizens of our States from unlawful business practices, and we are prepared to enforce antitrust laws if necessary to stop any illegal conduct by As You Sow,” the group wrote.

The coalition, also said As You Sow may violate consumer protection laws by engaging in deceptive marketing regarding its relationship between the nonprofit’s various entities.

As You Know is a for-profit entity with a close business relationship to As You Sow. The attorneys general said As You Sow shared data about public companies with As You Know.

As You Know, the attorneys general allege, uses its benchmarking tools based on datasets from As You Sow’s database.

“As You Sow generates data for As You Know and supplies the activism and rules-based proxy voting underlying the market for As You Know’s products and services sold to investors,” the letter reads.

The attorneys general questioned whether the two entities’ relationship could be considered independent given the information provided publicly in advertisements.

“If companies do what As You Sow demands, they will score more favorably on As You Know’s benchmarks sold to them and to investors, which in turn influence investments and proxy voting,” the letter reads.

Will Hild, executive director of Consumers’ Research, criticized As You Sow for its policy agenda and misrepresentation of business relationships between entities.

“Instead of focusing on things like lower energy costs or strengthening the American economy, As You Sow’s only priority is to reshape the energy sector to meet senseless net-zero benchmarks,” Hild said.

Attorneys general Steve Marshall, Ala.; Stephen Cox, Alaska; Tim Griffin, Ark., James Uthmeier, Fla.; Christopher Carr, Ga.; Raul Labrador, Idaho; Brenna Bird, Iowa; Kris Kobach, Kansas; Liz Murrill, La.; Catherine Hanaway, Mo.; Mike Hilders, Neb.; Drew Wrigley, N.D.; Gentner Drummond, Okl.; Alan Wilson, S.C.; Marty Jackley, S.D.; Derek Brown, Utah; Keith Kautz, Wyo.; joined Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen to sign the letter.

“As You Sow, a little-known but influential member of the climate cartel, is attempting to eliminate the fossil-fuel industry, which will have a devastating impact on Montanans, especially in the winter when we need fossil fuels to heat our homes,” Knudsen said.

“Their efforts to push their green, woke agenda and box out the fossil-fuel industry appear to be a violation of antitrust and Montana consumer protection laws. As attorney general, it’s my duty to ensure they are following the law and hold them accountable if they are not.”