By Evelyn Pyburn

The line of demarcation has slid into the purposeful confusion of political gamesmanship.

Now that the filing deadline has closed and all the candidates for this election are known, please, let’s make this election about IDEAS, not parties.

Given the fact that some people are (understandably) disillusioned about what their party has come to stand for—the division lines between one party and another has shifted out of sight. Now-a-days, what they brand themselves to be — Republican, Libertarian, Independent and even Democrat – isn’t going to convey much information about what a candidate really stands for. It’s going to take more than a party affiliation to know what you are voting for.

The situation demands much more of voters.

Let’s be honest – in some parts of the state – for those who want to serve their community as a political representative, there is little chance of getting elected as a Democrat because the Democratic Party of today is very different in their principles and ideas from Democrats of old – and not all Democrats are in step with those changes. And, I suspect many of them are sitting on the sidelines, not knowing what to do.

Even if “Democrats of old” step forward to represent the principles and ideas that the party used to be about, they put themselves in a position to be pressured and perhaps even threatened by the new movement. They will not be supported by new visionaries.

As we have already seen in the past few elections, some Democrats have filed and successfully ran as Republicans, elected by Republicans who believed they could trust to party affiliations. I have seen people almost fall off their chairs in being told that some Democrat party faithful has filed for office as a Republican.

And, some of those “success” stories are surely the reason for some of the highly public disputes in the Legislature, which were undoubtedly a reflection of those differences in IDEAS.

All of this is to say – – the division line between the two parties has shifted out of sight. That line now exists within the margins of the Republican Party, which means a “Republican” may not be a Republican and the situation demands far greater due diligence of voters. Voters must work harder at identifying what each candidate really stands for by asking lots of questions about IDEAS.

But when you think about it, IDEAS are really what all of politics should be about. For some that is probably a novel idea, so maybe this change is a good thing. It is harder to do but the outcomes should be well worth it. It’s harder because thinking through ideas – each and every one of them – takes a focused effort. And, time! And, maybe even some research. At least they do if you don’t want to end up with confusing and contradicting conclusions that make no sense.

Because that is a reality for one and all, don’t be surprised if the candidates themselves don’t want to address IDEAS. Being glib or attempting to avoid answering questions about issues and policies should be the first clue that such candidates are probably not who they present themselves to be. If they slide quickly past an issue with a trite comment, or if they only want to knock the other party or their opponent; and they indicate no serious thought to any looming issue, then talk to another candidate.

Get detailed and clear answers to questions, which might mean asking the questions more than once in order to identify contradictions. If you know and understand your thoughts and ideas, it won’t be hard to sort the chaff from the wheat. You just have to spend more time and effort.

But, please vote based upon ideas, upon their ideas and yours.

By Evelyn Pyburn

Last week, Yellowstone County officials announced the measures that county voters will be asked to approve on the November ballot to build an addition to the Yellowstone County Detention Facility (YCDF), to alleviate overcrowding. The “ask” isn’t as much as earlier estimates suggested because the State has announced that they are going to expand the State facility in Deer Lodge, which will alleviate much of the pressure on YCDF, said County Attorney Scott Twito, in making the announcement before the County Commissioners.

The County will be asking voters to approve a bond for a $175 million over 20 years to add 320 new beds. Also on the ballot will be a request to impose an annual levy for $20 million to meet operational needs – food, medical, maintenance, utilities, etc.

By law, said Twito, both measures have to be on the ballot. If one fails so does the other.

Past projections often mentioned that the likely cost to expand the jail by 512 new beds would be $225 million.

Much of the reason for the overcrowding at YCDF is because the county must hold state prisoners because there is no room at the state facility. On average the county jail could be holding as many as a hundred state prisoners a day waiting to be transferred to the state prison. In total the jail population has routinely hit over 600 and sometimes higher than 650 daily, in a facility designed to house 434.

The really good news, said Twito, is “the state’s timeline fits with ours.”

The estimated cost for property taxpayers in paying for the $175 million bond is $23 a year on a $100,000 house, $70 a year on a $300,000 house and $156 a year on a $600,000.

The estimated cost of taxes for the $20 million in annual operational costs will be $36 a year on a $100,000 house, $108 a year on a $300 house and $256 a year on a $600,000 house.

County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on March 31, 9 am, to approve the terms of the two ballot issues. Given the approval by commissioners, the measures will be on the General Election ballot on November 3.

Twito explained “how we got here.” He said, “It was no snap decision.” He has headed a group — Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (CJCC) – comprised of representatives of every aspect of law enforcement, as well as some residents of the community, for the past three years exploring the problems, possible solutions and costs.

Some of their successes include a new short term holding facility for inmates that enables law enforcement to hold misdemeanor perpetrators accountable, and the development of an arraignment court that speeds the judicial process. Both have increased processing times which have helped to relieve pressure on the jail.

County Commissioner Mark Morse explained that the crowded conditions make even the maintenance of the existing facility difficult. He said, “there is lots of wear and tear” and to fix those things “we need space to move people, . . for the safety of the officers and the public.”

County Commissioner Mike Waters noted that because of the crowded conditions judges have to make difficult decisions about who can be released with the least risk to the public.

Twito added to his point saying that as the County Attorney he, too, has to make those kinds of decisions “every day . . . I have had a lot of sleepless nights deciding who is out and who is in.”

Waters emphasized, “Everyone in jail needs to be there.”

City Councilman Scott Aspenlieder said that he “fully respects” the decision the committee has made. “The jail had to be built for a long, long time. I can tell you there is a cost to doing nothing.” He went on to praise the success of the short term facility, because “it has given officers the tool of arrest.” He urged speeding up the process because there is still work to do . . . “we have put it off for far too long.”

David Irons, representing a citizens group also voiced support at the meeting, joined by Dan Brooks with the Chamber of Commerce, interjecting “Me too!” Brooks noted that the Chamber has been hosting tours of the jail in order to give citizens a better insight.

Brandon Berger, director of Big Sky Economic Development emphasized the importance to the local economy of having an adequate jail because public safety is a “most important factor” for companies in deciding to come to Billings. Expanding the jail, he said, “is just one of the steps to improve public safety,” and BSED “is in full support.”

City Councilman Mike Boyett, a past deputy sheriff, said, “I encourage you to do this.”

The proposed 320 additional beds are projected to hold more offenders locally, preventing early releases due to overcrowding, “that can put dangerous individuals back into the county prematurely.

A list of the anticipated impacts of the jail expansion states that more beds will allow for immediate arrest for violent crimes and domestic violence. It will allow better response by law enforcement which will increase public safety by making people accountable for felony property crimes, repeat felony offenders, DUI offenders, and outstanding warrants.

The expansion will create a shell that will be able to accommodate future needs – up to 512 future beds. In addition, other spaces will be able to accomodate future support services for up to a 1,552 bed jail.

The condition of the current jail will be brought up to code for mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems.

There will be space for jail– based programs, as well as adequate space for attorneys, law enforcement and community based providers to meet with detainees, as well as better working conditions for detention staff.

Having adequate and safe spaces for prisoners also removes liability issues that could lead to costly lawsuits.

Investigation by Montana State Auditor and Commissioner of Insurance James Brown, and other state and federal agencies, have halted a fraudulent scheme of more than $50 million from an insurance company and the Affordable Care Act (ACA often called Obama Care).

The out-of-state fraudsters targeted vulnerable Native Americans in Montana, explained Brown. They sent recruiters to Montana reservations, convinced their victims to signup for rehabilitation services under an ACA plan, then transported the victims across state lines to fake clinics – most often in California – “for rehab treatments that did not take place, were unnecessary, or performed at greatly inflated prices.”

The perpetrators then billed the insurance company and ACA about $9000 a day for three months, which was the term of the treatment program. After three months, the offenders would ”dump vulnerable Native Americans onto the streets” with no means of returning home or means of support.

Following almost a year- long investigation, Brown said he was able to “claw back” more than $23.3 million of $54.7 million in fraudulent treatment claims, which victimized “Montana health care insurers, their customers, and some of the most vulnerable members of Montana’s tribal communities.”

To date, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has approved the rescission of 80  policies, with dozens more under review. 

Brown said that a goal of investigating agencies and his office was to halt the fraud before the perpetrators were able to implement their scheme in other states. Their continued efforts are to locate some of the 207 victims of the fraud.

“We are trying to determine where they are at this point,” said Brown, “We don’t believe that they were knowingly involved in the fraudulent scheme.”

One reason that members of Montana’s tribal communities were targeted was that under the Affordable Care Act, Native Americans may enroll in a marketplace health plan at any time.

Not long after assuming office as State Auditor, at the beginning of last year, Brown was notified by PacificSource about the suspicious activity. PacificSource is a not-for-profit health insurance provider, and one of Montana’s three providers of health insurance plans under the Affordable Care Act. PacificSource identified more than 200 health insurance policies against which tens of millions of dollars in potentially fraudulent claims had been filed.

Commissioner Brown said, “PacificSource did the right thing by coming to our office quickly to disclose this serious problem and work with us to protect an important player in our state’s health insurance system. That helped us put an end to this fraud scheme which preyed on innocent and vulnerable people in our state.”

For its part, PacificSource spokesperson Erik Wood said, “We’re grateful to Commissioner Brown and his team for their partnership and support. Their involvement has been instrumental in helping stop suspected fraudulent activity in the individual marketplace. As a nonprofit health plan, PacificSource exists to keep health care accessible and affordable for our members, and preventing fraud is an important part of that work. We appreciate the state’s commitment to protecting Montanans and the integrity of our health insurance system.”

The State Auditor’s authority ends at the state border, so the continued investigation required contacting the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and state agencies in other states, including California and Arizona. Prosecution of the suspected criminals must be pursued by the federal government.

I am pleased that we were able to get out ahead of this. We stopped the fraud,” said Brown, “We are government officials doing our jobs.” 

The CSI investigation found:

* Unlicensed and out-of-state actors manipulating federal healthcare enrollment systems

* False residency claims, fabricated addresses and unsupported earnings information used to obtain coverage

* Immediate, high-dollar billing patterns designed to extract maximum payouts

* Evidence warranting criminal referrals at both the state and federal level 

“This was deliberate abuse of a broken federal system,” Brown said. “If you exploit Montana’s healthcare system, we will identify and unwind your fraud, claw back the money, revoke licenses, and prosecute you. Period.”

“Montana is not Minnesota,” Brown said. “If you try to run healthcare scams here, you won’t get excuses, delays, or political cover. In Montana, you’ll get investigations, rescissions, and criminal referrals.”

Senate Majority Leader, Sen. Tom McGillvray, R- Billings, has joined two other Montana State Senators, Sen. Greg Hertz, R-Polson and former Sen. Keith Regier, R-Kalispell, in filing a lawsuit challenging the lawfulness of SB 542, which was one of Montana’s major tax reform bills passed by the 2025 State Legislature.

Filed in the Gallatin County District Court, plaintiffs in the case essentially claim that the bill is unconstitutional. It violates at several aspects of Article V, Section 3 of the Montana Constitution.

Sen. McGillvray explained that SB 542 was introduced by Sen. Wylie Galt, R-Martinsdale, as a tax freeze. As it passed through the legislative process it was amended so greatly that its purpose became unrecognizable as to its original intent, which made it unconstitutional according to the three Senators.

“It became a monstrosity,” said McGillvray.

It was introduced to freeze property taxes at their 2024 level, but it became a bill that revised and shifted taxes, provided multiple appropriations and even suspended local city charters, explained McGillvray. ”It became a bill with three different subjects and with multiple appropriations” – all of which stands in violation of the State Constitution, which requires that each bill must deal with only one subject .

Further – it was changed so drastically that the bill’s title no longer reflected its original purpose of freezing taxes at 2024 levels. The Montana Constitution also requires that a bill’s title must accurately reflect its subject matter. The Constitution restricts changing a bill so much that it is changed from its original intent.

Introducing bills dealing with several subjects – “that’s what they do in Congress,” said McGillvray, “They make a big bill with multiple appropriations, that picks winners and losers. They buy enough votes to get it passed. That is what we try to prohibit, so each legislator can look at a single subject.”

“Montanans pride ourselves that our Legislature debates each policy idea on its own merits, with genuine public participation. We’re not Washington, D.C., where massive bills get cobbled together behind closed doors and shoved down legislators’ throats as ‘must pass’ legislation,” continued McGillvray, “ Senate Bill 542 was Washington DC-style corruption. We warned our colleagues on the floor that SB 542 violated Article V, Section 11. We voted to send it to conference committee to fix the constitutional violations. The conference committee ignored the constitutional issues and passed it out with no changes – a sham hearing.”

Violation to Article V section 11: 1-5:

 (1) Change the original purpose of a bill (11) (1) a bill shall not be so altered or amended on it passage through the legislature as to change its original purpose.”  It changed from a 2 page 7 line amendment to freeze property taxes to raise property taxes permanently for some and lower it for others. 

2. . Single subject: (11) (3) (4) each bill except for a general appropriations bill … “shall contain only one subject, clearly expressed in its title.

SB 542 changed from one subject with the purpose to freeze property taxes to at least 3 subjects;

1.  Appropriate 92 million for the $400.00 rebate

2. Revise property tax rates in multiple property tax classes. It raised some rates, lowered others permanently, shifting the reduction from the 80% to the 10%, with the other 10% remaining about the same.

3. It suspended local charters and provided an additional appropriation to cover lost revenue for four years. (This is likely another constitutional violation) of local government powers. 

Senate Bill 542 is to be implemented in two phases. The first phase applied to tax year 2025 and the second phase will generate tax bills that will be issued in November 2026.

Despite a bitter cold wind, a large crowd gathered at the Billings airport to greet two members of the Blue Angels flight crew as they did a flyover of Billings in a F-18. The flyover of Billings launched ticket sales for the Yellowstone Air Show set for August 22 and 23.

The Yellowstone Air Show this year follows a hugely successful Air Show in 2023, produced by the same Billings volunteers, plus a few more. The visit by the two Blue Angeles, Lt. Ronny Hafeza and Cdr. Lilly Montana, was a routine mid-winter review with members of the Air Show committee to further plan and organize for the big event, explained Ben Flanagan, who is this year’s Air Show Superintendent.

Planners for the Airshow are focused on making it especially significant this year, since 2026 is the nation’s 250th Birthday. But in addition to that, 2026 marks significant milestones for the Blue Angeles. Lt. Ronny Hafeza and Cdr. Lilly Montana pointed out that it’s the 80th anniversary of the Blue Angels being a team and it’s their 40th year flying Boeing Aircraft.

After disembarking from their plane in front of an Edwards Jet Center hanger at the Billings Airport, Hafeza and Montana answered questions from those who gathered to greet them. Many of the questions came from a bunch of students from the Elysian Middle School Aero Club, comprised of students who are interested in aviation.

One of the students asked how they came to be called the Blue Angeles. The two pilots replied that was the name of the establishment where organizers met to put forth their plans to create the team in 1946. Formally known as the U.S. Navy Flight Demonstration Squadron, the team has six Navy and one Marine Corps pilots,  flying Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and the Lockheed Martin C-130J Super Hercules.

They explained that the jet in which they arrived in Billings is Number 7 and it is considered a “spare” jet, to serve as needed.

The Blue Angels typically perform in 60 or more shows annually at 32 locations throughout the United States.

Flanagan urged everyone to get tickets early. Tickets can be purchased on -line at yellowstoneairshow.com. Ticket prices begin at $10 for kids and $55 for adults for general admission. There are also tickets that go up to $350 for exclusive VIP service and special amenities. Flanagan explained that ticket sales will be limited by available parking space. Each day of the 2023 airshow about 20,000 spectators attended. This year they anticipate between 25,000 and 30,000 each day.

Since it is the nation’s 250th birthday, the Airshow committee is focused on making the event very special. During the interim, since 2023, the planning committee leaders, which includes co-chairs Matthew McDonnell and Jake Penwell, have been researching and “getting a lot of lessons” on  how to make the show bigger and better. They will be better prepared in going through the planning stages and making sure “we have the right people.” Some committee members have attended air shows in other states to gather new ideas.

Flanagan, who is overseeing the physical arrangement of the field, said that one of the changes this year will be to locate the space where the Blue Angels park their planes closer to the crowd so more people see them getting in and out of their planes. It is part of the ground show and not many people got to see it last time, he said.

Of course the Blue Angeles are the stars of the show but other amazing daredevil acts and performances are being lined up, which will be announced as the event draws near.

The event depends on local volunteers. On the two performance days they need 300 to 400 volunteers, said Flanagan, and while they have a lot of volunteers they still need more. Anyone wanting to volunteer may do so by contacting the committee through the website.

Flanagan said that they have many of their sponsors lined up but there are still opportunities for more. He noted that one of the unique things about the Yellowstone Air Show is that they provide a hospitality tent especially for sponsors.

By Evelyn Pyburn

A government that recognized the individual, didn’t exist until the emergence of the United States. Even during the Enlightenment, just the concept of it was just as readily recognized as a threat to autocracy as it is today, and it was just as fervently opposed by aspiring dictators. Individualism became a reality for the very first time, and essentially the only time, with the American Revolution.

Individualism was the “shot heard round the world.” And it is still reverberating.

Now that New York City, a city previously distinguished as the embodiment of economic freedom and recognized as such throughout the world, has elected a communist mayor, and now that liberals are heralding Venezuelan’s communist leader, Nicolás Maduro, as a hero, we shouldn’t be surprised that socialists will now turn with vehement attacks on private property. Private property must be the next target. Efforts to destroy western civilization and impose communalism cannot happen in the same sphere as private property rights.

Private property rights are about the individual person, not the collective. If society is to erase recognition of the sovereignty of One, over the nebulous impulses of the masses, the individual as a concept CANNOT be allowed to exist – which is what private property is all about. PRIVATE PROPERTY IS STANDING ROOM FOR THE INDIVIDUAL.

That is why private property never existed before the writing of the US Constitution. Never before was there a reason to differentiate one property from another. All property – everything – including the person — without question, belonged to the king, the despot, the overlord, the political elite.

The singular individual did not exist as a concept nor as a reality. Each One was the property of the feudal lord — readily dispensable upon the wavering whims to serve the horde. Without the ability to own themselves and the means of survival, the individual person is but fodder for the mob.

Any collectivist crusade must extinguish private property. It will now be attacked with vehemence, because you and I, as individuals, must be quashed, silenced, suppressed, and that cannot happen if we are allowed to own property – the means of our survival.

But this attack is not new. It has been going on for a very long time. At the very least, since public schools quit teaching the tenets of the US Constitution — since students ceased to learn about the differences in “isms” and most especially about the importance of private property rights.

In fact, the violation of property rights in the US has its own government infrastructure, which has offices in almost every town in the country. They oversee centralized planning, building codes, zoning, and community development. Besides being shielded from most State oversight, these agencies get the lion’s share of their funding from the federal government.

And, wow, have they ever been effective. It is almost exclusively because of this weighty governance that our country has a housing shortage. Just think about it. Has there ever been a demand for a product that cannot be delivered by the market? It is almost unheard of.

High prices indicate high demand. What other product, in high demand, doesn’t have the whole of the market place rushing to deliver it to consumers, as fast as possible? Even if the product is illegal, producers rush to meet market demand, ie. drugs! Black markets!

Housing has essentially become illegal through the unaffordability and encumbrances of building codes and other superfluous regulations. So absolute is its government prohibitions, the market cannot overcome them.

I have covered the issue of centralized planning, zoning and building restrictions since the 1970s and in all that time I have never heard any discussion from anyone regarding property rights or cost. Never, never in adding a new restriction or requirement has anyone ever said, “How much will that cost the homeowner?”

Oh, yes, the cost of whether the agency can afford to enforce some new rule has been raised, but never, never, never a word about whether the property owner – the individual citizen—  can afford to pay for the new mandate. And NEVER has there been discussion about its impact on businesses, or the economy and certainly not on housing affordability.

So as the socialists wring their hands and cry crocodile tears about how homes are no longer affordable, don’t believe they are sincerely concerned. The laments are not directed at changing the dictatorial system; they are but advancing the welfare state. They are pleading for government housing. Paving the way for a greater collectivist state and more bureaucracy.

Over the decades, this has all unfolded so effectively because public school children were not, and are not, taught about property rights, or about the Constitution and the pillars that uphold its principles. While the children may pledge to support freedom, they were never told there is no freedom without property rights.

And, unless citizens stand their ground against the attack upon property rights that is manifesting before us, we will lose it all – property rights include more than a house. Property rights are our means of conducting business, advancing technology and new ideas, of earning a living and being able to keep it, of having the means to learn or to invest or to support those we care about – of being able to have a savings or to keep our retirement funds, or of having a means to travel and the latitude to do so, and of pursuing good health. Property rights are our means to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

The Dude Ranchers’ Association Centennial Convention will be held in Billings, January 27. The event will feature the world premier of a new Wyoming PBS documentary exploring the past, present, and future of the American dude ranch.

“Call of the West” will screen at 7 p.m. in the Billings Livestock Horse Sales Ballroom of the DoubleTree by Hilton. The premiere is free and open to the public starting at 6:30 p.m.

“This film is about legacy, resilience, and the people who keep the spirit of the West alive,” says Wyoming PBS CEO Joanna Kail. “It reveals both the challenges they face and the passion that drives their dedication to this way of life.”

The documentary takes viewers inside working dude ranches across the region, highlighting families and operators navigating changing travel expectations, economic pressures, and the challenge of balancing tradition with modern realities.

Once again the Montana Environmental Information Center (MEIC) is suing the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) regarding their permitting of the NorthWestern Energy’s Yellowstone County Generation Station, located near Laurel. The case was filed by MEIC and the Western Environmental Law Center in Yellowstone County District Court on September 29.

Previous suits against the DEQ resulted in a re-do by the DEQ of their research in issuing a permit to the Generation Station, which still resulted in DEQ approving the permit. That was followed by another suit by MEIC again challenging the permit and demanding another re-do, claiming that they “…failed to consider greenhouse gas emissions and the lighting impacts of the facility” in its review. In that case, last January, the Supreme Court reversed a District Court’s decision to vacate the air quality permit, which was a win for NorthWestern Energy, which opened the Generation Station a year ago.

The new MEIC case might be viewed as a challenge to a new Montana state law – House Bill 971 — which bars the state from considering climate impacts in its analysis of large projects such as coal mines and power plants. 

The new MEIC case claims that DEQ failed to properly consider and disclose the climate impacts and greenhouse gas emissions associated with Yellowstone County Generating Station

The State Legislature passed House Bill 971 in response to the Supreme Court decision in Held v. Montana, in which the justices favored 16 youths who argued that Montana’s approach to regulating fossil fuel plants jeopardized their rights to a “clean and healthful environment”, which they claimed is guaranteed in the Montana Constitution.

Judge Michael Moses wanted to set aside the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) permit for the Generation Station, saying that DEQ failed to adequately assess the power plant’s impact on “global warming” – an almost impossible and prohibitively costly undertaking. Because of that reality, the Montana State Legislature responded with HB 971 which declared that entities such as power plants do not have to meet such a high bar, in order to become permitted. The Legislature called the Judge’s requirement impossible and potentially far-reaching for future Montana projects.

MEIC and other environmental groups have kept NorthWestern Energy tied up for a decade in legal challenges and court cases, over the Yellowstone County Generation Station, which the utility proposed to build in order to generate enough power to serve the state during periods of high consumption when demand exceeds supply.

Most recently, MEIC has focused on complaints of excessive lighting and sound, having failed in blocking the plant’s construction on issues regarding zoning.

First they sued over whether the City of Laurel or Yellowstone County had authority over zoning. The Court declared that the County had authority since it is outside Laurel city limits. Then the environmental groups challenged the appropriateness of the facility, as an industrial development, located as it is next to the CHS Refinery and the City’s Public Works Department Wastewater Treatment Plant.

MEIC claimed that the Generation Station is in violation of county zoning laws, being located in an area, part of which was zoned industrial and another zoned agriculture.

NorthWestern Energy points to extreme measurers they have taken to minimize noise and lighting impacts. Decibels emitted from the plant are less than those of a restaurant, commented one company officials in guiding media through the plant. The lighting is minimal coming from street lights that are in use only to the degree necessary for safety and are directed downward.

NorthWestern Energy officials point to the necessity of the Yellowstone County Generation Station to augment power supply when “the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine,” which means the alternative energy upon which they otherwise depend is not available – which happens quite often during the worst winter months. The company has on several occasions been forced to purchase power on the open market …which is very unreliable because it often happens when additional energy is also being sought by other utilities in the region.

Over the past few years NorthWestern Energy has had to spend about $5 million each year purchasing energy from the market to meet peak use demands.

The $310 million generating station is comprised of 18 reciprocating internal combustion engines that are capable of generating a total of 175 megawatts, which helps close the gap of the generation needs for NorthWestern’s customers in Montana.

NorthWestern Energy President and CEO Brian Bird has stated that the production of the Yellowstone County Generating Plant will cut in half the additional power that NorthWestern needs, but they won’t have all they need until the utility acquires ownership of Colstrip Units 3 & 4 at the beginning of next year.

Josh Follman, the generating station’s project manager, declared during an interview that the plant is “very good, very clean.” It is “One of the cleanest facilities because of its emissions profile.” According to Follman, the company does not have to monitor for emissions because their emissions are “far below the levels set to initiate controls. The plant is equipped with emission monitors that continuously take readings, and are programmed to “kick itself off” should emissions reach unacceptable levels. Because of its low emissions, NorthWestern is only required to submit reports to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), annually.

By Evelyn Pyburn

Confronted with a lot of questions from local officials that are going without answers, State officials have stepped back from their pursuit of finding a site for a behavioral health facility, funding for which was approved by the Montana State Legislature.

After conducting a tour of potential sites in several communities, Director of the Board of Investments,  Dan Villa, who has been charged with the task of finding a site, announced that he needs more direction and information from legislators, the Governor’s office and the Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS) in order to better answer the questions he is being asked by county and city officials about what kind of facility is envisioned and how it will operate.

The Montana Board of Investments was assigned the task of assisting DPHHS in finding a site for the proposed facility following the approval of $26.5 million by the 2025 Montana Legislature to build the long-discussed need for a facility. The facility will serve an ever-growing waiting list of inmates in need of mental health services. The Montana Board of Investments manages state-owned lands, and it is hoped that a property can be found that is already owned by the state as  a site, thus saving in its cost.

Senate Bill 5, which advanced the proposal in the state legislature, states that construction should start on the facility by June of 2026. Some comments from legislators, recognizing its urgent need, have suggested that it needs to be completed in two years.

As Villa visited the prospective sites – especially in Billings which has been broadly discussed as the preferable location – he was pelted with questions about how the facility would operate, what expectations would be imposed upon the community and taxpayers, and even whether it is to be a general “behavioral health facility,” or a “forensic facility,” which would accommodate criminals serving sentences, who need mental health treatment.

In June, it was reported that Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services Director Charlie Brereton told a state commission that they hope to locate a new facility “in the Yellowstone County region.”

In making the announcement, last week, that the search for a site is being put on hold, Villa told his Board of Investments that he needs more guidance to answer questions, especially in Billings where concerns run high that the addition of such a facility will just add to the burden of providing social services for the mentally ill and other unhoused, unemployed, indigent people.

County and city officials in Billings have asked how the patients or inmates of the facility will be processed, concerned that they will eventually be discharged with no support, compounding social problems and imposing additional costs on taxpayers. The lack of information that Villa has been able to provide has generated charges that the State is not complying with the state’s public information requirements.

Montana Senator Mike Yakawich, Billings SD24,  who served on the legislative committee that dealt with how to address the issue of behavioral health in Montana, said that it is estimated that the proposed facility would be about 50 beds and would hire 50 people or more.

The idea of building a second location for a behavioral health center is not a new idea, said Yakawich. It’s been around for about 20 years.

The only other option for inmates needing mental health care has long been Warm Springs, which can accommodate about 100 patients, which has faced its own struggles over the past couple of years. However, it too received funding from the recent State Legislature, which is expected to help solve some of its problems — problems which resulted in it losing its federal accreditation and federal funding.  Sen. Yakawich said that he is confident that Warm Springs will regain its accreditation this year.

Some state officials have stated that they believe Billings is a preferable location for a second location for several reasons, including a more strategic location to better serve Eastern Montana.

As Sen. Yakawich commented, it’s a very long drive for communities in Eastern Montana to transport prisoners to Warm Springs in Deer Lodge County. Transporting prisoners across the state from Eastern Montana communities is an onerous and costly process, he said.

Even those questioning plans going forward readily concede the need for an additional facility in the State. Many of the inmates that are being held in local jails – including the Yellowstone County Detention Facility – should be in a facility that provides mental health care but there are no openings. Others are waiting long stretches in jail for mental health assessments they cannot get because of a lack of health care professionals.

Billings is the best choice for the site, say some civic leaders, because it has a wide variety of support services and a bigger workforce, as well as a larger community that might better attract prospective workers.  A shortage of prospective workers is a problem that has plagued Warm Springs, as well as law enforcement and jails, and other medical providers across the state.

That Billings is a preferred location because it already has other support services is exactly what makes the county commissioners and some city council members concerned about what such a facility could impose on the community and especially on taxpayers.

County Commissioner Mark Morse pointed out that the services that Billings has are beyond full capacity, with little or no funding available to expand them, while demand continues to grow.

Morse also emphasized that Yellowstone County decided some time ago to “invest in themselves” and take care of some of its needs for which county taxpayers have paid. They were not intended for use by the state nor should county taxpayers be expected to pay for the needs of the state, he said.

And, the State does not have a good record as far as the County Commissioners are concerned, in doing their part to support the full cost of State prisoners in the county jail. For more than a decade the State has refused to fully pay the county the daily cost of housing State prisoners. The State pays the county  $82.59 a day, while the County calculates the true cost at $117.

Morse further asked what will the State do when they release an inmate – just turn them out onto the streets of Billings?

In the past, there have been complaints from other county officials, who claim that other communities appear to give their troubled citizens a one-way bus ticket to Billings, which often means they are homeless and vying for the same over-capacity services in Billings.

Another county department head said that Yellowstone County does not have the workforce that the State is talking about. She said that while nationally they are claiming that there are two job openings for every worker, the figure is much higher in Yellowstone County. Every health care department, county sheriff and jail, as well as businesses, are struggling to hire the labor they need.

Questions about what the State’s plans are, went unanswered by the state officials, complained Morse and city officials. He said that in attendance during the site visit to Billings, there were representatives of a design firm and a construction contractor – “you don’t have them” unless there are plans available.

Yakawich pointed out that many of the answers about what the facility will be is probably not yet known because most of the planning won’t happen until a site is proposed.

Yakawich said he “gets” the concerns of the community, but has no problem with the facility locating in Billings. Yakawich said he understands the acute need not just for the State, but also for Yellowstone County and Eastern Montana to have a second health care facility.

Plans to revamp Exposition Drive, which passes by MetraPark, connecting the intersection of US Highway 87 and 1st Avenue North, which extends to Main Street in the Heights, are being pursued by the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT).

The community is invited to attend an open house to learn more about the Exposition Drive and 1st Avenue North Intersection project. The open house will be held at the Billings Public Library Community Room located at 510 North Broadway, on Tuesday, August 19 from noon to 1:30 p.m. and  4:30 to 6:30 p.m. 

The open house is designed to be an informal event for community members to meet the project team, ask questions, and provide feedback. As such, no formal presentation will be made. Information regarding the project’s design and schedule will be available. Information from the open house is also available on the project website.

The project is in the stage of design development and right-of-way acquisition.

Construction is projected to begin in 2027, although that is subject to change depending on funding availability, design completion, right-of-way acquisition, and other unforeseen factors.

“MDT is excited to discuss the project and share design concepts that aim to address capacity and queuing issues, enhance safety and mobility, as well as improve pavement conditions, drainage, and the pedestrian and bicycle environment,” said Mike Taylor, MDT Billings District Administrator.

The Exposition Drive (Main Street) & 1st Avenue North project will enhance safety and improve bicycle and pedestrian connectivity, vehicle capacity, freight, drainage, and pavement condition within the project area. These improvements are intended through the following project components:

Safety

* Installing raised medians on sections of 1st Avenue North.

* Improving lighting on Main Street and 1st Avenue North.

* Removing the unsignalized, eastbound slip-lane at the Main Street and 1st Avenue North intersection.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity

* New sidewalk and shared-use path connections on Main Street and 1st Avenue North, including a connection to the Jim Dutcher Trail.

* New or improved crossings at intersections throughout the project area.

Vehicle Capacity

* Converting the westbound right turn-lane at the Main Street and 1st Avenue North intersection to free-running movement.

* Adding a fourth northbound travel lane on Main Street from 1st Avenue North to 4th Avenue North.

* Improving storage lengths of turn lanes at the Main Street and 1st Avenue North intersection.

 Partnering with the community is an important part of properly planning for future projects. MDT welcomes the public to provide ideas and comments on the proposed project. Comments may be submitted online at mdt.mt.gov/contact/comment-form.aspx or in writing to Montana Department of Transportation, Billings office, PO Box 20437, Billings, MT 59104-0437. Please note that comments are for project UPN 7908000.

 Questions from the public should be directed to Design Project Manager Shaun Sampson at 406-4449413.